Bacon's Dictionary
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
The exhibits and miniatures of which are found in this section, are designed to assist the serious student and reader in following the path of the Authorship Controvesy that has been so laboriously persued by many authors and researchers during its commence.These exhibits have been placed here as not to interrupt the flow of reading in the Baconian Dictionary sections, being a finding list of Bacon’s works, his history, his thoughts and his aims, which are a subject of study and discussion. |
England’s Helicon
The third anthology, A Gorgeous Gallery of Gallant Inventions, edited by a certain Thomas Procter, was issued in 1578. One of the chief contributors was Owen Roydon, who may have been a brother of Matthew Roydon (the friend of Chapman and author of a famous elegy, on Sir Philip Sidney). Many of the poems are of a sententious character and are written in long cumbersome metres; but there are also some sprightly love-ditties. Fourth on the list comes Clement Robinson’s Handful of Pleasant Delights, 1584, a very choice collection. Here first appeared the delightful ballad of Lady Greensleeves. “L.G.,” “I.P.,” “I. Tomson,” and “Peter Picks,” were among the contributors; all four are unknown, and “Peter Picks” is doubtless a pseudonym. Antony Munday’s A Banquet of Dainty Conceits, 1588, of which only a single copy is known, must not be classed with the anthologies; for the twenty-two pieces which it contains were all written by Munday. Intrinsically the poems have little interest; but the collection is on that account important, as affording excellent proof that Antony Munday was not the “Shepherd Tony” of England’s Helicon. Munday was an inferior writer, whose pen was chiefly employed in composing city-pageants and translating romances from the French. Among these Dainty Conceits there is not even a passable lyric to be found. In 1593 appeared the fifth anthology, The Phoenix Nest, edited by “R.S. of the Inner Temple, Gentleman.” To whom the initials “R.S.” belong is a mystery; but all lovers of poetry are indebted to the taste and zeal of this unknown editor. Among the known contributors were Thomas Lodge and Nicholas Breton; and there are many exquisite poems by anonymous writers. England’s Helicon, first published in 1600 and republished with additions in 1614, stands sixth on the list. England’s Parnassus, 1600, and Belvedere, 1600, are dictionaries of poetical quotations rather than anthologies. The last anthology (the seventh) published in Elizabeth’s reign was Francis Davison’s Poetical Rhapsody, a collection of the highest interest, first printed in 1602; reprinted with additions in 1608; again, with many additions, in 1611; and for the fourth time (with a new arrangement of the poems) in 1621. The reader will find in England’s Helicon some of the sweetest lyrical and pastoral poetry of the Elizabethan age, dainty little masterpieces by Lodge, Breton, Greene, Barnfield, and many other true-born poets. He will also find two dozen poems by Bartholomew Young (or Yong), translator of Montemayor’s Diana. Possibly Bartholomew Young (an unpoetical name) may even find here and there an admirer. Who was the editor of England’s Helicon? Clearly “A.B.” (whoever he may have been), author of the prefatory Sonnet To his loving kind friend Master John Bodenham. Yet bibliographers, one after another, with remarkable perversity, assure us that Bodenham was the editor, yet Bodenham did not edit any of the Elizabethan miscellanies attributed to him by bibliographers; he projected their publication and he befriended the editors. The miscellanies issued under Bodenham’s patronage were:
In regard to number two in the above list of Wit’s Theatre, it is perfectly clear that Robert Allot 1 was the editor; for a copy (preserved in the British Museum) of the 1599 edition contains an epistle in which Allot dedicates to Bodenham this “collection of the flowers of antiquities and histories.” Prefixed to number 3 in our list, Belvedere, is a Sonnet by A[ntony?] Munday?] in which Bodenham is addressed as “Art’s Lover, Learning’s friend, first causer and collector of these flowers,” words which imply that Bodenham had suggested the compilation and had prepared some materials for the volume. Bodenham gave his support and patronage; Ling, Allot, and “A.B.” collected and arranged the materials for the miscellanies with which Bodenham’s name is associated. England’s Helicon second edition in 1614, which contains nine additional poems, has a dedicatory Sonnet by the publisher, Richard More, addressed “To the truly virtuous and honourable Lady, the Lady Elizabeth Carey.” This lady was the wife of Sir Henry Carey (created Lord Falkland in 1610), and mother of the famous Lucius Lord Falkland who fell at Newbury. She was certainly the “Lady Elizabeth Carey” who wrote The Tragedy of Mariam the Fair Queen of Jewry, 1613. John Davies of Hereford in 1612 linked her name with the names of Lucy Countess of Bedford and Mary Countess-Dowager of Pembroke in the dedicatory verse epistle prefixed to his Muse’s Sacrifice; and to her in 1633 William Sheares the publisher dedicated the collective edition of Marston’s plays. She died in 1639. The Faerie Queene began in 1582, and published in 1590. The three first Books of the Faerie Queene, which (as the title page, and he himself, in his letter to Sir Walter Raleigh, informs us) was to have been disposed into Twelve Books, fashioning XII. Moral Virtues. That Volume has been usually called a Quarto; but, from the Printer’s Signature, it is plainly an Octavo. On the Back of that title page in some copies (for it is not in all) is the following Dedication in capitals thus pointed: “To the most mighty and magnificent Empress Elizabeth, by the grace of God Queen of England, France and Ireland Defender of the Faith &c. Her most humble Servant: Ed. Spenser.” To the end of the third book was annexed a letter to Sir Walter Raleigh, and seven copies of verses addressed to the author of the Faerie Queene, the two first by Sir Walter and the third, which is signed Hobynoll, by his Friend Mr. Gabriel Harvey who is everywhere distinguished, in the poet’s works, by that name. Then follow the several copies addressed, by Spenser himself, to Sir Christopher Hatton, The Earl of Essex, The Earl of Oxenford, The Earl of Northumberland, The Earl of Ormond and Ossbry, The Lord Charles Howard, The Lord Grey of Wilton, Sir Walter Raleigh, The Lady Carew, and to all the gracious and beautiful Ladies in the Court. The two last copies fill the page 605, and there is added Finis: and on the back of that page (which is numbered page 606) are faults escaped in the print, which Errata take up only three fourths of the page, and the remainder is blank: and this, it should seem, was the whole of what the poet, at first, intended for that volume. Hobbinol, a poet contributor, was Spenser’s chief friend at the University, and was Gabriel Harvey of Trinity Hall, made Dr. of Law in 1585. This acquaintance is all we have to mention of Spenser at Cambridge: for the story of his (landing for a Fellowship, and being set aside, is so probably a mistake, that we must drop it. But Harvey was so amiable a man and so ingenious, that we cannot wonder at their intimacy, and at the very great deference Spenser pays to his judgment. Though there are many poetical things of this gentleman extant, yet we might be sure of his genius, if it were only from that beautiful poem of his under the name of Hobbinol before the Fairie Queene. He seems to have lived to 1630, and was probably then above seventy. 2 The Dedication to Sir Walter Raleigh is dated January 23, 1589. Raleigh in return praised the poem in two Sonnets. These, together with five other versified encomiums by “Hobynoll” [Gabriel Harvey], “R.S.,” “H.B.,” “W.L.,” and “Ignoto,” are prefixed to Spenser’s work. In 1599 The Passionate Pilgrim, a collection of twenty-one Sonnets, songs, etc., was published with the name of W. Shakespeare on the title page. The authorship of several of the pieces is disputed. In regard to No. 18 My flocks feed not, Halliwell-Phillipps, says: “There is a somewhat brief version of this song in the collection of Madrigals, by Thomas Weelkes 1597, this person being the composer of the music, but not necessarily the author of the words. A copy of it as it is seen in the Passionate Pilgrim also occurs in England’s Helicon, 1600, entitled The Unknowne Sheepheards Complaint, and is there subscribed Ignoto.” In regard to No. 20, Live with me and be my love, the same author says: “The first, of these very pretty songs is incomplete, and the second, called Love’s answer, still more so. In England’s Helicon, 1600, the former is given to Marlowe, the latter to Ignoto; and there is a good reason to believe that Christopher Marlowe wrote the song, and Sir Walter Raleigh the nymph’s reply: for so we are positively assured by Isaac Walton, who has inserted them both in his Complete Angler under the character of “that smooth song which was made by Kit Marlowe, now at least fifty years ago; and an answer to it which was made by Sir Walter Raleigh in his younger days: old fashioned poetry but choicely good.” Both these songs were exceedingly popular and are afterwards found in the street ballads. The first is quoted in the Merry Wives of Windsor.” In regard to No. 21, As it fell upon a day, Halliwell-Phillipps, says: “This charming idyl occurs, with the absence of two lines, amongst the Poems in Divers Humours appended to Barnfield’s Encomion of Lady Pecunia, in 1598 and the first twenty-six lines with the addition of two new ones are found in England’s Helicon, 1600. This latter version follows in that work No. 18 of this list, [My flocks feed not,] is also subscribed Ignoto, and is headed: Another of the same Sheepheards. The probability is that the copies of these little poems, as given in the Helicon, were taken from a Common Place book in which the names of the authors were not recorded; the two supplementary lines just noticed having the appearance of being an unauthorized couplet improvised for the sake of giving a neater finish to the abridgment.” The editor of the third edition of the Helicon 1812 says in regard to Ignoto: “This signature appears to have been generally, though not exclusively, subscribed to the pieces of Sir Walter Raleigh. It is also subscribed to one piece since appropriated to Shakespeare, [No. 18,] and to one which, according to Ellis, belongs to Richard Barnfield [No. 21.] The celebrated answer to Marlowe’s, Come live with me, here subscribed Ignoto, is given expressly to Raleigh by Isaac Walton in his Complete Angler, first published in 1653.” Ignoto was undoubtedly a concealed poet. Marlowe, Raleigh and Barnfield were not. As early as January 1590, if not a little sooner, Ignoto contributed to Spenser’s first publication of the Faerie Queene. There are sixteen pieces in the Helicon subscribed Ignoto. One of these, The Nymph’s Reply is ascribed to Raleigh on the testimony of Walton in 1653; and two others are believed by the editor of the third edition, 1812, to belong to Raleigh, because in an early copy of the same Ignoto was found pasted over “W.R.” Upon such flimsy evidence the modern editor infers that the signature Ignoto was “generally, though not exclusively, [his own italics,] subscribed to the pieces of Sir Walter Raleigh.” Poor neglected Shakespeare has but a single specimen in the Helicon: On a day, alack a day taken from Love’s Labour’s Lost.
1 Allot was also the editor of England’s Parnassus 2 Spenser. Faerie Queene with notes, by Ralph Church, Vol. I. 1758
Contents of England’s Helicon:
Francis Bacon must be counted among Sir Henry Wotton’s friends and correspondents, though only one letter from Bacon to Wotton, and one from Wotton to Bacon have been preserved. They seem, however, to have corresponded more or less regularly, and to have regarded each other as friends and kinsmen. The family connexion was through the Cookes and Belknaps, Bacon’s mother, Anne Cooke, being the great-grand-daughter of Sir Philip Cooke, who married Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Henry Belknap, and sister of Anne Belknap, wife of Sir Henry Wotton’s great-grandfather, Sir Robert Wotton. Sir Henry Wotton was also descended from Sir Henry Belknap, through his mother and his niece, Philippa Wotton, who married Francis Bacon’s nephew, Sir Edmund Bacon. There is little further evidence of their friendship. The mention of “Francesco” and Lady Bacon’s other uncle in Wotton’s letters, may refer perhaps to Francis Bacon. In 1635 Wotton sent Sir Gervase Clifton a collection of Bacon’s letters. Izaak Walton, in his advertisement to the Reliquiae, says that Bacon “thought it not beneath him to collect some of the sayings and apophthegms of this author.” One of these sayings is printed in Bacon’s Apophthegms, No. 64. “Sir Henry Wotton used to say ‘that critics are like brushers of noblemen’s clothes.’” The epitaph on Bacon’s tomb at St. Michael’s, St. Albans, ending with the well-known phrase, composita solvantur, was composed by Wotton. 4 Among the contemporaries of Shakespeare an interesting but little-known figure is that of the poet and Ambassador, Sir Henry Wotton. It is still remembered that he was the author of two or three beautiful lyrics which are to be found in every anthology; that he went as Ambassador to Venice, and fell into temporary disfavour owing to a witty but indiscreet definition of his office; and that afterwards he became Provost of Eton, where he was visited by the young Milton, and where he fished with Izaak Walton, who quoted his sayings in the Complete Sir Henry Wotton and the most widely cultivated Englishman of his time. A ripe classical scholar, an elegant Latinist, trained in Greek by his studies with Casaubon, he was an admirable linguist in modern languages as well. He corresponded with Francis Bacon about natural philosophy, and was the friend of most of the learned men of that epoch, both at home and on the Continent; the first English collector of Italian pictures, he brought from Italy, where he lived many years, the refined taste in art and architecture, the varied culture of antiquity and the Renaissance, which was then only to be derived from Italian sources. His experiences of life were exceptionally varied, even in that spacious and enterprising age. Leaving England in 1589, he spent some time abroad in study and adventurous travel; he was much about the Court of Queen Elizabeth; he accompanied Essex to Ireland and on his famous voyages; he went in the service of an Italian Duke to the Court of James VI., and when that King succeeded to the English throne, was sent as his Ambassador to many places. Famous in his own day as a “wit and fine gentleman”, he deserves to be remembered as a noble example of that much maligned class, the “Italianate” Englishmen one who, with all his foreign culture, never lost the sincerity and old-fashioned piety of a “plain Kentish man.” Although his services as an Ambassador were not always of the first importance, and his longer literary works are of a somewhat disappointing character, he yet may be counted as one of the great Elizabethans, with whom high actions were so remarkably combined with high literary expression. For Sir Henry Wotton was endowed with one gift, that of a letter-writer, which none of his more famous contemporaries possessed. Indeed, the very qualities or faults that stood in the way of his complete success, either as a statesman or author; the witty frankness that caused him to be a somewhat indiscreet diplomatist; a certain desultoriness of mind, combined with a great love of leisure and conversation, which hindered the completion of most of his literary tasks, all these made him an admirable correspondent. And letter-writing was not only one of the great pleasures of his life, but, as Ambassador, almost his main duty. Among the somewhat formal and colourless epistles of that age his letters are remarkable for their wit, their beauty of phrase, and the impress of his kindly and meditative nature. His shortest note could not have been written by anyone else; his long diplomatic dispatches are enlivened by reflections, epigrams, and bits of personal comment and observation. Sometimes eloquent, sometimes intimate, now informed by cynical but not unkindly knowledge of the world, and now by honest religious zeal, he put all his stores of thought and experience into his letters, in a way that was unique at the time and is unusual in any age. Anyone who has read those written in the leisure of Venice or Eton will agree that it is no exaggeration to call Sir Henry Wotton the best letter-writer of his time the first Englishman whose correspondence deserves to be read for its literary quality, apart from its historical interest. His style, although it may seem at first, to those not familiar with the style of the time, somewhat courtly and elaborate, yet possesses great qualities of beauty and distinction, and much of that quaint richness of thought and phrase which we associate with authors of a later date George Herbert, Sir Thomas Browne, or Izaak Walton. Of subsequent writers, Walton owed more than anyone else to Sir Henry Wotton, and may be regarded as his disciple and follower. In the Life of Donne and the Compleat Angler he accomplished tasks which Wotton had left unfinished; and he seems to have caught his simple yet courtly grace of style from the example and discourse of the old Provost. The two men, indeed, had much in common; both were lovers of fishing and quiet days; both possessed the same musing piety and serenity of soul; and both were devoted members of the English Church, whose spirit Walton has so beautifully expressed in his Lives, and in whose orders Sir Henry appropriately ended his life, after striving so long as an Ambassador for its defence and advancement. In the first edition of the Reliquiae Wottonianae, published in 1651, Izaak Walton added to Wotton’s Essays and poems fifty-eight of his letters. Eight more were added to the second edition of 1654, and in 1661 fourty-two new letters, almost all addressed to Sir Edmund Bacon, were printed in a little volume, which is now excessively rare. These, with the addition of thirty-one fresh letters and dispatches, were incorporated in the third edition of the Reliquiae in 1672, and finally in 1685 the Reliquiae was republished with thirty-four more letters, all but one addressed to Lord Zouche, and all written in the early period of Wotton’s life. Izaak Walton seems to have put together Sir Henry Wotton’s letters and papers in the Reliquiae Wottonianae pretty much as they came to hand, with small regard to date or order. Little or no improvement was made in the subsequent editions, and the result is extremely confusing. Letters written in the same year are scattered over different portions of the book, many are without date or address, and there are no notes of any kind. No one has yet attempted to re-edit this correspondence, although the Reliquiae Wottonianae has always been prized by lovers of seventeenth century literature, and the need of a new edition has often been remarked. “His despatches,” Carlyle wrote of Wotton in his Frederick the Great, “are they in the Paper Office still? His good old book deserves new editing, and his good old genially pious life a proper elucidation by some faithful man.” In 1850 the Roxburghe Club had published a volume containing the sixty-five letters and dispatches of Wotton’s preserved at Eton; and in 1867 thirteen more, preserved at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, had been printed in Vol. CI., of Archaeologia, much the greater part of his correspondence, and many of his most interesting letters, had never yet been printed, and were to be found widely scattered in various manuscript collections, college libraries, the muniment rooms of country houses, and Italian archives. In the Record office alone there are about five hundred letters and dispatches; others are preserved in the British Museum, the Bodleian, the archives of Venice, Florence, and Lucca. Others, of which the originals have disappeared, have been published in different volumes of memoirs and correspondence. Altogether, nearly one thousand of Wotton’s letters and dispatches, published and unpublished exist, and it is possible that there are others which have escaped a researcher. That his diplomatic papers should have been preserved is not surprising; but that nearly fifty letters should remain, written between 1589 and 1593, from Wotton’s twenty-second to his twenty-sixth year, when he was an obscure youth wandering about Europe, is somewhat remarkable, if we remember that James Spedding, with all his research, was only able to find seven letters written in the same early period of Francis Bacon’s life. When travel stained couriers galloped through the gates of old walled cities with, in the phrase repeated by Wotton, “lies in their mouths and truth in their packets” which Francis Bacon attributes the phrase to Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester. 5 Webster made use of it in Vittoria Corombona, Vol. III., I: “Your mercenary post-boys: your letters carry truth, but ‘tis your guise to fill your mouths with gross and impudent lies”; and when to know the news of the world, to gain the confidence of the well-informed, to study the masked faces of statesmen, and to rob the posts, was a profession in itself. About Wotton’s life while in the service of Essex, we have not much information. Only eleven letters, written between the years 1595 and 1600, seem to have been preserved; and although his name appears occasionally in Anthony Bacon’s papers, the references are for the most part of no great importance. Edward Reynolds, another of the Earl of Essex’s secretaries, wrote to Anthony Bacon that he observed “some spleen in his carriage”; and when in 1596 Essex sent Dr. Henry Hawkins on a political mission to Italy, Anthony Bacon accused Wotton of keeping back some letters of introduction, which were found “in a merchant’s window in London by my Cousin Harry Wotton’s dutiful care and discreet address.” Anthony Bacon wrote to Essex begging that the matter might be sifted to the bottom, and to Hawkins telling of the discovery of the letters, and adding: “but let us leave my cousin for such as he is; but doubt you not but I have and will improve this my cousin’s prank and your disaster for his shame and your advantage the best I can.” Wotton declared, however, that the letters discovered in London were duplicates, and that the originals had been sent; and as we shortly afterwards find Wotton in the position of secretary for Italian and German business, it is plain that Anthony Bacon’s accusations did not injure him in his patron’s [Essex] eyes. Wotton, in his Parallel, 4th edition on page 169, accuses Anthony Bacon of procuring a gift of Essex House from Essex by a threat to betray to Queen Elizabeth the correspondence between Essex and James I. The improbability of this story has been demonstrated by Birch and Spedding, and other writers. 6 At Lintz, Wotton saw Kepler, and in an interesting and often-quoted letter to Francis Bacon, he describes his first sight of the camera obscura, with which the great astronomer entertained the Ambassador. Wotton urged Kepler to come to England, promising him a favourable reception from James I., but Kepler, although flattered (as his letters show) by Wotton’s visit and invitation, was unwilling to desert Austria, where, in a time of war and trouble, he had found a home. And, moreover, as he quaintly says, being accustomed to the mainland, he dreaded the narrowness and dangers of an island life. In describing to Bacon the camera obscura which Kepler had showed him in 1620, he had remarked that to paint landscapes by this process “were illiberal; though surely no painter can do them so precisely.” And in the second part of his book, where he treats of painting and sculpture, he states as a problem worthy of philosophical examination, “how an artificer, whose end is the imitation of nature, can be too natural.”
3 Collectanea, Oxford Historical Society, I. 278 4 (a) Life of Bacon, prefixed to Rawley’s Resuscitatio, 1657 (b) Aubrey. Brief Lives, 1898, Vol. I. p. 76 5 Works, Ellis and Spedding, Vol. VII. p. 127 6 How the story may have arisen is explained by Spedding, in Notes & Queries, 2nd ser., Vol. III. p. 252
With all this confusion what are we to believe in regard to Ignoto? Was he sometimes Raleigh, sometimes Barnfield, sometimes Dyer, sometimes Greville, and sometimes Shakespeare, or someone else? Or was he a single person who “loved better to be a poet than to be counted so;” and who affected to hoodwink the above-named Greville writing to him in 1596: “For poets I can commend none, being resolved to be ever a stranger to them.” And here let us note a bit of internal evidence that Bacon wrote the little poem in praise of the Faerie Queene signed Ignoto. One couplet of it is as follows: “For when men know the goodness of the wine, ‘tis needless for the host to have a sign.” No. 517 of Bacon’s Promus of Formularies and Elegancies is this: “Good wine needs no bush.” The word “bush” as applied to wine is thus defined by Webster: “A branch of ivy (as sacred to Bacchus) hung out at vintners’ doors, or as a tavern sign; hence a tavern sign, or the tavern itself.” And in Shakespeare’s As You Like It: “If it be true that good wine needs no bush, ‘tis true that a good play needs no epilogue.” We leave the reader to put this and that together; argument or comment is superfluous.
7 Francis Osborn. Historical Memoirs on the Reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James, 1658 8 W.F.C. Wigston. The Columbus of Literature, 1892
|